Angled axis machine vision system and method

ABSTRACT

An angled axis machine vision system having two cameras angled with respect to roil axis. Provides advantages of horizontal alignment between two cameras and eliminates problem of utilizing horizontal/vertical lines in the environment for distance calculations when lines arc parallel or close to parallel to axis between camera centers. With camera centers angled about roll axis, horizontal/vertical lines in environment appear angled with respect to horizon, enabling accurate distance calculations. With the cameras angled about roll, lines in the environment may line up parallel to the axis between camera centers, but these instances are rare in real world environments. May be rotatably mounted in the roll axis wherein two sets of pictures from each of the cameras may either he utilized: the two sets compared for the number of parallel lines parallel to axis between camera centers and the set of pictures with least parallel lines used for distance calculations.

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

Embodiments of the invention described herein pertain to the field ofmachine vision systems. More particularly, but not by way of limitation,these embodiments yield improved calculation of distance in environmentscomprising substantially horizontal and substantially vertical featuresthrough use of stereo digital cameras that are rotated in at least oneaxis comprising at least the roll axis.

2. Description of the Related Art

Machine vision systems allow computers to view the physical world. Amachine vision system comprises at least one camera coupled with acomputer. A computer is used to interpret an image taken from a camerathereby enabling a machine vision system to perform various tasks. Tasksperformed by machine vision systems are diverse and include distanceestimation that is used in applications involving robot navigation. Theuse of two cameras in order to calculate a distance to an object isknown as binocular or stereo machine vision. Because of theirinexpensive price and richness of data, CMOS and CCD cameras are usedfor machine vision applications such as robot navigation that make useof a three dimensional image of an object or an environment in which arobot is situated.

Sensors such as ultrasonic, radar and lidar are used to actively sensethe environment. Active sensors transmit a signal and analyze thereflection of that signal. Cameras are passive sensors that require amore intricate analysis of data obtained from the camera to map an imageas compared to active sensors. According to Computer Vision,Three-Dimensional Data from Images by Klette, Schluns and Koschan,binocular stereo vision is a process that transforms two images seenfrom slightly different viewpoints into a perception of thethree-dimensional space. Hence, the use of stereo digital cameras is ofgreat interest for machine vision systems.

Stereo machine vision, or stereovision, involves the use of two or morecameras separated from each other to view an object or environment.Features comprise points on objects, edges or other visible markings.Features as seen by digital cameras are located in different relativepositions in the images, depending on their orientations and distancefrom the cameras. The difference of a feature's location in two imagesis called the feature's pixel disparity or disparity. The position of afeature in three-dimensional real world coordinates is determined by thefeature's disparity and the camera specifications and geometry.

Two key technical aspects of stereovision analysis techniques involvemethods to determine the points in two images that correlate with oneanother and to determine where the point is in the physical world withas much accuracy as possible.

There are many known methods for matching features between images. Afeature is otherwise known as a point of interest. Example methods formatching points of interest include pixel-by-pixel correspondences anddisparities; image patch correlation that divides one image intorectangular patches of pixels and then searches for similar patches inthe other image; shading and gradient analysis; edge detection andmatching; and object matching. Various combinations of these approachescan also be used. Once features are matched, the feature disparities canbe calculated. There are many texts that describe the geometry todetermine the position of a feature based on the disparity between theimages.

As the measured accuracy of the stereo geometry or the feature's pixeldisparity decreases, so does the accuracy of the relative position ofthe feature in three-dimensional space. Any feature in one image thatcan be matched with several features in the other image is problematicand either must be ignored or leads to low accuracy for the estimate ofthe feature's three-dimensional position. It is therefore desirable tominimize the number of this type of feature that appears in typicalenvironments.

The type of feature that is the most problematic is any line that isparallel to the axis defined in the direction between the cameracenters. This is because every portion of the line in the first imagematches every portion of the line in the second image equally well sothe match is completely ambiguous and unusable. Lines that are not quiteparallel to the line between the camera centers are also problematic.While there is a theoretical best match, slight problems such aslighting discontinuities render these lines that are close to parallelunusable. It is easy to mismatch lines that are nearly parallel to thecameras and such a mismatch results in a feature location estimate whichis erroneous which is worse than not using the feature location estimateat all.

Most stereo camera systems consist of two horizontal coplanar cameras.Vertical coplanar cameras also exist but are less common. Researchershave also experimented with “Trinocular” systems, stereovision usingthree cameras. In these systems, the cameras are typically mounted onthe same plane either with all three cameras mounted along one axis orin a right angle configuration with two cameras mounted side-by-side andthe third camera mounted vertically above one of the other two.

These vertical and horizontal mounting configurations are the standardused in all machine vision systems. In addition to providing thesimplest geometry, these configurations mimic nature; human eyes areessentially mounted horizontally on a planer surface. Camera images aretypically rectangular, and the planer-horizontal configuration alignswell with typical coordinate systems.

The world contains many horizontal lines, particularly in indoorenvironments. These include moldings and horizontal edges to doors,windows and furniture. These objects are very strong features that wouldgreatly aid in the motion of mobile robots, but are unusable by a visionsystem with cameras configured horizontally. Using a vertical cameraorientation makes it virtually impossible to correlate features onvertical lines. This includes corners between walls, and vertical legson furniture. Trees and other plants contain many vertical edges inoutdoor environments.

These systems and methods fail to utilize the correlation of strongfeatures such as horizontal and vertical lines to simplify thecorrelation of features between images in a stereovision system and aretherefore limited in their ability to estimate distances.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

Embodiments of the invention comprise an angled axis machine visionsystem having a camera system angled with respect to an axis of thecoordinate system of the environment. This configuration has all of theadvantages of the horizontal alignment while eliminating the inherentproblem of utilizing horizontal and vertical lines in an environment fordistance calculations when the horizontal and vertical lines areparallel or close to parallel to an axis lying between camera centers ofthe camera system. With the camera centers angled about the roll axis,horizontal and vertical lines in the environment appear as angled linesin images taken from the cameras enabling more accurate distancecalculations. With angled axis rotation it is still possible for linesin the environment to be parallel to the axis defined between the cameracenters, but these instances are rarer than horizontal or vertical linesin real world environments. Embodiments of the invention may comprise acamera mount that is rotatably mounted to a support wherein two sets ofpictures from each of the cameras may either be utilized wherein eachset of pictures may be taken from a different roll angle for example.Embodiments of the invention may comprise more than one pair of camerasmounted at different angles with respect to each other in any axis. Inembodiments employing more than one pair of cameras, images may besampled in any order from each camera including simultaneously. In oneembodiment the two sets are compared for the number of lines which areparallel to the axis of the camera centers and the set of pictures withthe least lines parallel is used for distance calculations. In anotherembodiment for example the two sets of images may be completely analyzedwith or without use of lines parallel to the axis of the camera centersto correlate the distances derived from each set of pictures.

In addition to rotating the cameras about an axis parallel to theground, i.e., the roll axis, the stereo camera system may also bepitched up or down about the pitch axis. In a mobile robot, pitching thecameras downward enables a robot to view the ground directly in front ofthe robot close to its base.

In one embodiment, the cameras are mounted parallel to the ground, butare rotated 36.9 degrees from horizontal.

Standard CMOS and CCD cameras have a 4:3 aspect ratio (640:480).Rotating the cameras 36.9 degrees aligns the diagonal of the cameraimages with real worlds' horizon. Thus the cameras give the widesthorizontal viewing angle with respect to the ground. “Substantially 37degrees” means any mounting angled to take advantage of the diagonal ofa 4:3 aspect ratio camera that is in keeping with the spirit of theinvention, namely between purely horizontal and purely vertical, or 0and 90 degrees but closer to 37 degrees than 45 or 29 degrees.

In another embodiment, the cameras are parallel to the ground androtated 45 degrees. A 45-degree orientation optimally rotates thecameras and, thus, the line between the camera centers is not parallelto either the horizontal and vertical lines in the environment.Additionally, after horizontal and vertical, 45-degree angles are themost common and are easy for people to envision, design and manufacture.“Substantially 45 degrees” means any mounting angled to take advantageof the diagonal of a 1:1 aspect ratio camera that is in keeping with thespirit of the invention, namely between purely horizontal and purelyvertical, or 0 and 90 degrees but closer to 45 degrees than 37 or 29degrees.

In another embodiment, the cameras are parallel to the ground androtated 29.4 degrees. A 29.4-degree orientation optimally rotatescameras with 16:9 aspect ratio and thus, the line between the cameracenters is not parallel to either the horizontal and vertical lines inthe environment. “Substantially 29 degrees” means any mounting angled totake advantage of the diagonal of a 16:9 aspect ratio camera that is inkeeping with the spirit of the invention, namely between purelyhorizontal and purely vertical, or 0 and 90 degrees but closer to 29degrees than 37 or 45 degrees.

Another embodiment of the invention provides for an adjustable mountingangle between 0 and 90 degrees for environments that compriseenvironmental lines other than horizontal and vertical. The angle may berotatable altered in embodiments of the invention employing rotatablemounting of the camera mount in order to minimize processing and errorin distance calculations. The rotating of the camera mount may beperformed if error estimates are too large for example. Taking one setof images from the cameras and rotating the camera mount followed bytaking another set of images from an alternate angle may be used todetermine the best set of images to use, for example the image set withthe fewest lines parallel to the axis defined along the camera centers,or to correlate distance calculations from both sets of images. Thesetechniques may be utilized in environments where movement of anassociated robot and collision avoidance is critical, for example in anuclear power plant.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A is a drawing of a stereovision set of cameras and lens mountedon printed circuit board in standard horizontal configuration.

FIG. 1B is a drawing of a stereovision set of cameras and lens mountedon printed circuit board in angled roll axis configuration.

FIG. 2 is a flow chart for feature detection in a stereovision systemutilized in an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 3 is a flow chart for calibrating a stereovision camera system inaccordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 4 shows image pixels of a horizontal line taken by a stereovisionsystem employing a standard horizontal camera alignment.

FIG. 5 shows image pixels of a horizontal line taken by a stereovisionrobot employing an angled axial alignment.

FIG. 6 shows the image pixels of FIG. 5 rotated 45-degrees ready foranalysis.

FIG. 7 shows images of a room taken by a stereovision system employing astandard horizontal camera alignment

FIG. 8 shows images of a room showing taken by stereovision systememploying a 45-degree camera alignmemt.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the invention comprise an angled axis machine visionsystem having a camera system angled with respect to an axis of thecoordinate system of the environment. This configuration has all of theadvantages of the horizontal alignment while eliminating the inherentproblem of utilizing horizontal and vertical lines in an environment fordistance calculations when the horizontal and vertical lines areparallel or close to parallel to an axis lying between camera centers ofthe camera system. With the camera centers angled about the roll axis,horizontal and vertical lines in the environment appear as angled linesin images taken from the cameras enabling more accurate distancecalculations. With the camera centers angled downward about the pitchaxis objects that are near are more readily observed. With angled axisrotation it is still possible for lines in the environment to beparallel to the axis defined between the camera centers, but theseinstances are rarer than horizontal or vertical lines in real worldenvironments. Embodiments of the invention may comprise a camera mountthat is rotatably mounted to a support wherein two sets of pictures fromeach of the cameras may either be utilized. In one embodiment the twosets are compared for the number of lines which are parallel to the axisof the camera centers and the set of pictures with the least linesparallel is used for distance calculations. In another embodiment, thetwo sets are utilized to correlate the distances derived from each setof pictures.

In the following exemplary description numerous specific details are setforth in order to provide a more thorough understanding of embodimentsof the invention. It will be apparent, however, to an artisan ofordinary skill that the present invention may be practiced withoutincorporating all aspects of the specific details described herein. Anymathematical references made herein are approximations that can in someinstances be varied to any degree that enables the invention toaccomplish the function for which it is designed. In other instances,specific features, quantities, or measurements well-known to those ofordinary skill in the art have not been described in detail so as not toobscure the invention. Readers should note that although examples of theinvention are set forth herein, the claims, and the full scope of anyequivalents, are what define the metes and bounds of the invention.

FIG. 1A shows stereo camera system 100 comprising a camera mount 101 inthe typical horizontal orientation. The camera mount may comprise forexample a printed circuit board (PCB). The cameras for example may beCMOS based. In one embodiment where camera mount 101 comprises PCB, thePCB may be a 0.06′ thick, two-layer layer board that contains camerachips, a microprocessor or digital signal processors for analyzing theimage, memory, support circuitry and devices utilized in communicatingwith the remainder of the machine vision system. Lenses 103 and 104 andlens holders 102 and 105 cover camera chips (not shown for ease ofillustration). If desired, camera mount 101 may be mounted into asupport such as for example a robot or any other machine vision systemusing mounting holes 106.

From the perspective of the cameras, the left camera, left lens 103 andleft lens holder 102 are mounted on the same plane as and horizontal toand a known distance from the right camera, right lens 104 and rightlens holder 105. In reality, there may be slight variations in thealignment between the left and right camera assemblies. Thesedistortions, and those caused by the inconsistencies by the lensesthemselves (i.e. a “fish-eye” effect), may be calibrated out of thesystem using algorithms such as described by Moravec , CMU RoboticsInstitute Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-96-34, September 1996. At the endof this process, the camera system closely approximates the standardstereo geometry with coplanar cameras with collinear horizontalcenterlines.

FIG. 1B shows an embodiment where camera mount 101 is mounted at anglerelative to the horizon, i.e., rotated through the roll axis. In thisembodiment, the angle of axial rotation is for example 45-degreesalthough any angle between 0 and 90 degrees may be utilized. Forenvironments where many lines exist or where distance calculations aredetermining possibility of inaccuracies, rotation of the camera systemabout at least the roll axis may be performed dynamically. Angling theroll axis dynamically and re-estimating distances may be repeated untilerror estimation for selected features is calculated to be beneath athreshold or until a configured time has elapsed for example.Alternatively a set of pictures may be discarded if there are too manyambiguities in distance and a plurality of picture sets may be utilizedto correlate distance estimates to objects.

FIG. 2 is a flow chart for a feature mapping algorithm for an embodimentof the invention. The process begins by acquiring an angled stereo imageof a scene at 201. In one embodiment, each of a pair of stereo camerasmounted on a robot simultaneously takes a picture. The system may chooseone of the images as the base image, in which it will search for afeature at 202. A feature may be a discontinuity between adjacent pixelswithin the scene and may be based on luminance, color or any otherparameter derived from the picture. When a feature has been identifiedin the base image, the computer system will search the second image tolocate the same feature at 203. This process may involve comparing a setof pixels around the feature to each pixel and the set of pixelssurrounding it along the epipolar line in the other image until it findsthe best match at 204. Once the feature is matched, the system maydetermine the disparity between its locations in each image at 205. Thedisparity is used to calculate the distance to the feature at 206. Thisprocess repeats at 207 until the system either has identified eachfeature in the base image or until it determines it has identified asufficient number of features to complete its task at 208. Optionally,the entire process can be repeated after rotating PCB 101 to a differingroll angle in order to re-calculate distances to selected features, forexample if too many ambiguities exist or if verification throughcorrelation of feature distances is desired.

In one embodiment, the stereo camera system is calibrated to removeimage distortion such as the fish-eye effect caused by wide-anglelenses. The calibration also removes distortions caused by camera andmounting variations. The end result of the calibration is a mapping ofinput pixel positions in the uncalibrated image to output positions in acalibrated and rectified image for each camera. This process is shown inFIG. 3. In one embodiment, the stereo cameras are solidly and rigidlymounted co-planar, with the scan lines aligned at 301. The camera pairmay be mounted in known relative positions with a known distance andorientation from a known calibration image 302. The camerassimultaneously take pictures of the known image at 303. Alternatively,the cameras may sequentially take pictures of the calibration image atany interval since the camera mount may be configured to comprise astatic distance between cameras. If at least one of the cameras ismounted to move along the axis defined between the cameras thencalibration may be performed at the maximum and minimum separationbetween the cameras and utilized in the calibration process. Such amounting could for example be used in environments with requirements fordistance estimation wherein the environment comprises a large disparityin the object sizes and distances.

The images are transferred to the calibration system comprising acomputer program run on a microprocessor. The microprocessor may be aremote computer either networked to the cameras via a wired or wirelessnetwork. Alternatively, the camera system may include a microprocessoror DSP that performs the calibration. Any other means, such as a personphysically transferring the images via a floppy disk are also possible.The system then calculates the mapping between each pixel in thedistorted, translated, and rotated input image and the rectified imageat 304.

FIG. 4 shows an example where the entire image is a single horizontalline 7 pixels long as taken by a stereovision set of cameras and lensmounted on a camera mount in standard horizontal configuration as shownin FIG. 1A. FIG. 4 shows the scene both as seen by a left camera as perimage 400 and right camera as per image 401. Line 402 in the left image400 is shifted one pixel to the left of line 403 in the right image 401.The pixel shift is the actual disparity for the line between the images.One technique for the image processing system to determine the disparityis to select features in one image and then attempt to match the featureto a specific pixel in the other image. In this example pixel 404 hasbeen selected for feature correlation.

One method utilized in matching features involves comparing a smallgroup of pixels including the feature pixel and those surrounding it,namely pixel group 406. In this example, a nine-pixel group has beenselected. The selected pixel group can be compared with every nine-pixelgrouping in the other image and the best match determined statistically.A significantly less computationally intensive algorithm is used withcalibrated systems that contain known epipolar lines. In one embodiment,the epipolar lines are mapped onto the horizontal scan lines. In thisexample, the pixel group only needs to be compared to the nine-pixelgroups in the other image along the matching scan line 405.

For pixel group 406, there are possible 5 matches in scan line 405. Thesystem will either determine there are multiple matches and discard thepixel as a possible feature, which decreases the useable features in theimage or incorrectly correlate the feature between images yielding anincorrect scene analysis.

FIG. 5 shows left image 500 and the right image 501 the same horizontalline 502 and 503 when viewed by an embodiment of the invention employingan axial angled camera system angled for example at 45 degrees from thehorizontal as shown in FIG. 1B. A horizontal line in the environment inthis set of pictures shows up at an angle with respect to the axisdefined by the camera centers. The line is only 5 pixels long (thediagonal of the pixel is 1.4 times the length of either side). For easeof discussion, FIG. 6 shows the same image pair rotated 45 degrees tohorizontal for simplified visualization and analysis. The line 602 inthe left image 600 is shifted one pixel to the left when compared to thesame line 603 in the right image 601. Pixel 604 has been selected as afeature for correlation.

Pixel group 605 in the left image is compared to the pixel groups alongthe corresponding scan line 606 in the right image. In this case thereis a single possible correlation resulting in an accurate sceneanalysis. In addition, each pixel in the line can be correctly mappedbetween the left and right images increasing the amount of detailuseable for scene analysis. In some scenes, the potential featuresincreases by 50% or more. In indoor environments comprising manyvertical and horizontal lines this increase in accuracy of distancemeasurements is of great advantage.

FIG. 7 shows a typical indoor room viewed by a stereo camera system witha horizontal alignment. Left image 700 and right image 701 showvirtually the same scene with the image shifted slightly sidewaysbetween the two. In the image it is possible to see baseboard 702 a and702 b, table 704 a and 704 b and chair 703 a and 703 b. Tworepresentative epipolar lines 705 & 706 are shown for reference. In theimage, it is obvious that many of the natural lines are eitherhorizontal or nearly so, which severely inhibits the ability to analyzethe scene using the configuration shown in FIG. 1A. With a horizontalconfiguration, the baseboard, table top, chair leg supports and seat areunusable.

FIG. 8 shows the same indoor room viewed by a stereo camera system withfor example a 45-degree angle alignment. The left image 800 and theright image 801 also show virtually the same scene with the imageshifted slightly sideways between the two. Baseboard 802 a and 802 b,table 804 a and 804 b and chair 803 a and 803 b are still visible. Tworepresentative epipolar lines 805 and 806 are shown for reference. Inthis scene it is apparent that few of the natural lines are parallel ornearly parallel to the epipolar lines, so the machine vision system canmake an accurate three-dimensional analysis of the scene.

One application for a stereovision system is mobile robotics. Mobilerobots use cameras for mapping and navigating within their surroundingenvironment. A larger number of features enables a mobile robot tocreate a better map and to better keep track of the feature locationswithin the map. Rotation of the camera mount in environments comprisinglines roughly parallel with the axis of the camera set may be performedin order to garner more accurate distance calculations. Taking a secondset of pictures after rotating the camera mount can be used to eliminatea set of images from use in distance estimates or to correlate distancestaken from a plurality of sets of images. This is possible when thecamera mount is rotatably mounted to an object, for example a mobilerobot.

Thus embodiments of the invention directed to an Angled Axis MachineVision System and Method have been exemplified to one of ordinary skillin the art. The claims, however, and the full scope of any equivalentsare what define the metes and bounds of the invention.

1. A system for calculating distances to objects withinthree-dimensional space in an environment comprising horizontal andvertical lines using an angled axis machine vision system comprising: afirst camera; a second camera mounted coplanar to said first camerawherein said first camera and said second camera comprise collinearhorizontal center lines; a camera mount coupled with said first cameraand said second camera wherein said camera mount is at a fixed rotationof a first axial angle with between 0 and 90 degrees about a roll axisdefined as parallel to ground; and, a computer configured to perform adistance calculation wherein said computer is coupled with said firstcamera and said second camera and configured to calculate a distanceusing a first picture obtained from said first camera and a secondpicture obtained from said second camera to a feature found along anepipolar line parallel to said collinear horizontal center lines whereinsaid feature exists on a horizontal or vertical line in an environmentwith respect to said ground, yet wherein said line appears at said firstaxial angle with respect to said epipolar line when said camera mount isat said rotation of said first axial angle and wherein said distancecalculation calculates distance to said feature using said epipolar lineintersection with said horizontal or vertical line at said first axialangle to increase accuracy and useable detail and minimize errors insaid distance calculation.
 2. The system of claim 1 wherein said firstaxial angle is substantially 45 degrees.
 3. The system of claim 1wherein said first axial angle is substantially 37 degrees.
 4. Thesystem of claim 1 wherein said first axial angle is substantially 29degrees.
 5. The system of claim 1 wherein said camera mount is rotatedin a second axial angle between 0 and 90 degrees about a pitch axisdefined as parallel to an axis that runs through said first camera andsaid second camera and orthogonal to said roll axis.
 6. A method forcalculating distances to objects within three-dimensional space in anenvironment comprising horizontal and vertical lines using an angledaxis machine vision system comprising: attaching a first camera and asecond camera to a camera mount wherein said first camera and saidsecond camera comprise collinear horizontal center lines; rotating saidcamera mount in a first axial angle to a fixed rotation between 0 and 90degrees about a roll axis defined as parallel to ground; obtaining afirst picture from said first camera; obtaining a second picture fromsaid second camera; and, calculating a distance using said first pictureobtained from said first camera and said second picture obtained fromsaid second camera to a feature found along an epipolar line parallel tosaid collinear horizontal center lines wherein said feature exists on ahorizontal or vertical line in an environment with respect to saidground, yet wherein said line appears at said first axial angle withrespect to said epipolar line when said camera mount is at said rotationof said first axial angle and wherein said calculating comprisescalculating distance to said feature using said epipolar lineintersection with said horizontal or vertical line at said first axialangle to increase accuracy and useable detail and minimize errors insaid distance calculation.
 7. The method of claim 6 wherein said firstaxial angle is substantially 45 degrees.
 8. The method of claim 6wherein said first axial angle is substantially 37 degrees.
 9. Themethod of claim 6 wherein said first axial angle is substantially 29degrees.
 10. The method of claim 6 farther comprising: rotating saidcamera mount in a second axial angle between 0 and 90 degrees about apitch axis defined as parallel to an axis that runs through said firstcamera and said second camera and orthogonal to said roll axis.
 11. Asystem for calculating distances to objects within three-dimensionalspace in an environment comprising horizontal and vertical lines usingan angled axis machine vision system comprising: means for attaching afirst camera and a second camera to a camera mount wherein said firstcamera and said second camera comprise collinear horizontal centerlines; means for rotating said camera mount in a first axial angle to afixed rotation between 0 and 90 degrees about a roll axis defined asparallel to ground; means for obtaining a first picture from said firstcamera; means for obtaining a second picture from said second camera;and, means for calculating a distance using said first picture obtainedfrom said first camera and said second picture obtained from said secondcamera to a feature found along an epipolar line parallel to saidcollinear horizontal center lines wherein said feature exists on ahorizontal or vertical line in an environment with respect to saidground, yet wherein said line appears at said first axial angle withrespect to said epipolar line when said camera mount is at said rotationof said first axial angle and wherein said means for calculatingcomprises software configured to calculate a distance to said featureusing said epipolar line intersection with said horizontal or verticalline at said first axial angle to increase accuracy and useable detailand minimize errors in said distance calculation.
 12. The system ofclaim 11 wherein said first axial angle is substantially 45 degrees. 13.The system of claim 11 wherein said first axial angle is substantially37 degrees.
 14. The system of claim 11 wherein said first axial angle issubstantially 29 degrees.
 15. The system of claim 11 further comprising:means for rotating said camera mount in a second axial angle between 0and 90 degrees about a pitch axis defined as parallel to an axis thatruns through said first camera and said second camera and orthogonal tosaid roll axis.